Inclusive Classrooms cut down on the mocking of Autustic Kids

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Jimmy was a13 year old special needs kid who had not yet learned to run on the soles of his feet.  He was sometimes mocked for running on his toes in a manner that captured the attention of many given his well above the norm height of 6′ 3”.

Jimmy’s mother frequently scolded insensitive teens who made fun of his unnatural gait in malls, sports venues and other public places. Jimmy and his sister were both autistic and received FAPE and other services at the public school they attended. Their school favored inclusive practices meaning special Ed kids were not isolated in separate classrooms or separated from their peers in general education classes.

Jimmy’s mom speculated that the children who made fun of him did not go to schools where inclusion was honored making them unfamiliar with the awkward physical characteristics and mannerisms of ASD children. You see, one of the most significant benefits of inclusive educational practices is preventing the mocking and chastising of the disabled and challenged by them having them around the “normal kids” daily in class.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 comments on “Inclusive Classrooms cut down on the mocking of Autustic KidsAdd yours →

  1. This seems like a good place to publish my disagreement with Elizabeth Landau regarding her claim that siblings of autistic kids experience language delays. While this sounds plausible, she provides only biased data collection and statistical methods to support her erroneous claim.

  2. The road to hell is paved with good intention. The notion of inclusion is typically perceived as existing because many perceive it as just and Christian. HOWEVER, financial resources are not always available for inclusion to be properly administered. Moreover, the smart, gifted, and talented students frequently get bored and distracted when a kid with learning issues slows things down. I get that inclusion’s aim is not to make retarded pupils feel bad, but what about the neglect of the smart kids who are not being academically challenged?

    Ysseldyke, Stanovich, Lupart, Bursuck, and both Turnbulls are esteemed educational theorists who would concur. Right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *